Prevalence of Myofascial Pain Syndrome and Its Association with Work Productivity Among Bankers

Authors

  • Huzaifa Sattar Department of Physical Therapy, University of Sialkot, Sialkot, Pakistan image/svg+xml
  • Anika Zainab Department of Physical Therapy, University of Sialkot, Sialkot, Pakistan image/svg+xml
  • Amina Naveed Department of Physical Therapy, University of Sialkot, Sialkot, Pakistan image/svg+xml
  • Fatima Mehvish Department of Physical Therapy, University of Sialkot, Sialkot, Pakistan image/svg+xml
  • Maryam Afzal Department of Physical Therapy, University of Sialkot, Sialkot, Pakistan image/svg+xml
  • Raveena Rajput Department of Physical Therapy, University of Sialkot, Sialkot, Pakistan image/svg+xml

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55735/mbjjc804

Keywords:

Bankers , Ergonomics , Musculoskeletal disorders, Myofascial pain syndrome, Occupational health , Work productivity

Abstract

Background: Myofascial Pain Syndrome is a frequent musculoskeletal condition marked by localized pain, tight muscle bands, and trigger points. Bankers are at higher risk due to prolonged sitting, continuous computer work, and poor ergonomics, leading to neck, shoulder, and upper-back discomfort. While MPS is common in office professions, its specific impact on work productivity among bankers remains underexplored. Objective: To assess the prevalence of myofascial pain syndrome and its association with work productivity among bankers. Methodology: A cross-sectional study was carried out from March to September 2025 after obtaining ethical approval (Ref # USKT/FAHS/RECLetter-00078) from the Department of Allied Health Sciences, University of Sialkot. A total of 377 bankers working in various public and private banks across Sialkot were included in the study using non-probability convenience sampling. The study included participants aged between 25 and 40 years, both male and female, who had been engaged in the same type of job for at least one year. Eligible participants were those involved in prolonged sitting and computer use for a minimum of eight hours daily over the past year. Individuals were excluded if they had any pre-existing musculoskeletal conditions, injuries, or trauma, or were regularly involved in fitness training. The myofascial pain syndrome questionnaire was employed to assess pain characteristics, trigger points, posture habits, aggravating factors, relieving positions, and their impact on daily functioning. The Impact of Work Environment on Civil Servant Productivity Scale assessed workplace-related factors, including ergonomics, break patterns, workstation support, posture, stress, and motivation. Association between this syndrome and work productivity was assessed using Pearson’s correlation test. Results: Among the 377 participants (259 males, 118 females), the mean age was 31.57 years. A high prevalence of MPS was observed, with 88.9% categorized as high and 10.3% as severe risk. Work productivity levels showed 1.3% low, 34% moderate, and 64.7% high productivity. Pearson correlation indicated a weak, statistically insignificant relationship between MPS and work productivity (r=0.069, p=0.179). Conclusion: The Study concluded that myofascial pain syndrome was highly prevalent among bankers, and it showed no significant association with work productivity. Despite discomfort and trigger points, productivity levels remained largely unaffected.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Galasso A, Urits I, An D, et al. A comprehensive review of the treatment and management of myofascial pain syndrome. Current Pain and Headache Reports 2020; 24(8): 43.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11916-020-00877-5

2. Steen JP, Jaiswal KS, Kumbhare D. Myofascial pain syndrome: an update on clinical characteristics, etiopathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment. Muscle & Nerve 2025; 71(5): 889–910.

https://doi.org/10.1002/mus.28377

3. Carnevali G, Lodi F, Zucchinelli L, Carnevali G. Myofascial pain syndrome: an understanding of molecular biology and management. European Journal of Musculoskeletal Diseases 2021; 10(3): 131–5.

4. Gulati M, Gupta N, Potturi G, Dadia S. Pharmacological & non-pharmacological treatments available for myofascial pain syndrome–a scoping review. Cuestiones de Fisioterapia 2024; 53(3): 1656–70.

https://doi.org/10.48047/CU

5. Dorsher PT, Schmid O, Fleckenstein J. The “most common” myofascial trigger points and classical acupuncture points. Part 1: Anatomic and pain indication correspondences. Deutsche Zeitschrift für Akupunktur 2025; 68: 58–70.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s42212-025-00735-8

6. Wiratama GM, Nugraha MHS, Andayani NLN. Prevalence study of musculoskeletal disorders among bank workers. Physical Therapy Journal of Indonesia 2024; 5(1): 32–7.

https://doi.org/10.51559/ptji.v5i1.184

7. Greggi C, Visconti VV, Albanese M, et al. Work-related musculoskeletal disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Clinical Medicine 2024; 13(13): 3964.

https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13133964

8. Lew J, Kim J, Nair P. Comparison of dry needling and trigger point manual therapy in patients with neck and upper back myofascial pain syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy 2021; 29(3): 136–46.

https://doi.org/10.1080/10669817.2020.1822618

9. Minakawa Y, Miyazaki S, Waki H, et al. Clinical effectiveness of trigger point acupuncture on chronic neck and shoulder pain (katakori) with work productivity loss in office workers: a randomized clinical trial. Journal of Occupational Health 2024; 66(1): uiad016.

https://doi.org/10.1093/joccuh/uiad016

10. Ezzati K, Ravarian B, Saberi A, et al. Prevalence of cervical myofascial pain syndrome and its correlation with the severity of pain and disability in patients with chronic non-specific neck pain. Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery 2021; 9(2): 230.

https://doi.org/10.22038/abjs.2020.48697.2415

11. Boota M, Shaban S, Munawar A, Ahmed A. Prevalence of neck pain in Bankers of Lahore. Malaysian Journal of Medical Research (MJMR) 2018; 2(1): 30–6.

12. Saeed R, Noor R, Bashir MS. Work related Neck disability due to active myofascial trigger points (MTrPs) in female computer users. Rawal Medical Journal 2019; 44(1): 151–154.

13. Kibret AK, Gebremeskel BF, Gezae KE, et al. Work‐related musculoskeletal disorders and associated factors among bankers in Ethiopia, 2018. Pain Research and Management 2020; 2020(1): 8735169.

https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8735169

14. Tangrood ZJ, Gisselman AS, Sole G, Ribeiro DC. Clinical course of pain and function in subacromial shoulder pain: a systematic review protocol. BMJ Open 2018; 8(5): e019393.

https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019393

15. Takamjani IE, Ezzati K, Khani S, et al. Reliability of ultrasound findings in patients with lumbar multifidus myofascial pain syndrome. Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery 2023; 11(4): 248–255.

https://doi.org/10.22038/ABJS.2022.63591.3067

16. Ribeiro DC, Belgrave A, Naden A, et al. The prevalence of myofascial trigger points in neck and shoulder-related disorders: a systematic review of the literature. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 2018; 19(1): 252.

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-018-2157-9

17. Adams G, Salomons TV. Attending work with chronic pain is associated with higher levels of psychosocial stress. Canadian Journal of Pain 2021; 5(1): 107–16.

https://doi.org/10.1080/24740527.2021.1889925

Downloads

Published

30-03-2026

Issue

Section

Research Article

Categories

How to Cite

1.
Sattar H, Zainab A, Naveed A, Mehvish F, Afzal M, Rajput R. Prevalence of Myofascial Pain Syndrome and Its Association with Work Productivity Among Bankers. HJPRS [Internet]. 2026 Mar. 30 [cited 2026 Jan. 16];6(1):23-9. Available from: https://thehealerjournal.com/index.php/templates/article/view/572

Share

Similar Articles

1-10 of 275

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)