Effects of Cervicothoracic Self-Mobilization Along with Conservative Treatment in Subacute Neck Pain: Randomized Controlled Trial

Authors

  • Zunaira Shafaqat Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, Superior University, Lahore, Pakistan image/svg+xml
  • Sahar Aslam Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, Superior University, Lahore, Pakistan image/svg+xml
  • Fatima Liaquat Yashfeen College of Allied Health Science, Lahore, Pakistan
  • Aasim Manzoor Yashfeen College of Allied Health Science, Lahore, Pakistan
  • Faiz Ur Rehman Subhani Johar Institute of Professional Studies, Lahore, Pakistan
  • Zobia Saeed Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, Superior University, Lahore, Pakistan image/svg+xml

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55735/xtxs0e91

Keywords:

Cervicothoracic, Conservative treatment , Disability neck pain , Self-mobilization , Subacute pain

Abstract

Background: Subacute neck pain is a common musculoskeletal condition that can significantly affect daily functioning and quality of life. Traditional treatment often provides temporary relief, leading to a growing interest in alternative approaches such as cervicothoracic self-mobilization. This technique is believed to alleviate pain, improve mobility, and restore function through patient-directed movements. Objective: To compare the effects of cervicothoracic self-mobilization along with conservative treatment on pain intensity, cervical range of motion, and neck disability in individuals with subacute neck pain. Methodology: A randomized controlled trial was conducted with 66 participants diagnosed with subacute neck pain, and data were collected from Bajwa Hospital, Lahore. Participants with an age range of 20 to 45 years, both genders, those who had a history of sub-acute pain lasting at least three weeks, and reported a pain intensity of ≥3 on the Numerical Pain Rating Scale. Patients were excluded if they had a history of cervical fracture, tumor, or other inflammatory diseases. Individuals presenting with radiculopathy or neuropathy were also excluded. Additionally, patients diagnosed with vestibular dysfunction were excluded, as were pregnant or lactating females. Participants were randomly assigned to either a control group that received standard physical therapy or an experimental group that underwent cervicothoracic self-mobilization along with conservative treatment. Pre- and post-treatment assessments included the Numeric Pain Rating Scale, Neck Disability Index, and cervical range of motion. The intervention was conducted over six weeks, with the experimental group performing self-mobilization exercises three to five times per week. Results: Significant improvements were observed in the experimental group, with pain intensity decreasing from 7.81 to 4.51 (p<0.001), neck disability reduced from 28.86 to 18.86 (p<0.001), and improvement in cervical flexion and extension (p<0.001). Conclusion: Cervicothoracic self-mobilization, along with conservative treatment, is an effective intervention in the reduction of pain, improving cervical range of motion, and decreasing neck disability in patients with subacute neck pain. This technique offers a practical, low-cost treatment option for improving functional outcomes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Kazeminasab S, Nejadghaderi SA, Amiri P, et al. Neck pain: global epidemiology, trends and risk factors. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 2022; 23(1): 26.

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04957-4

2. Childress MA, Stuek SJ. Neck pain: initial evaluation and management. American Family Physician 2020; 102(3): 150–56.

3. Verhagen AP. Physiotherapy management of neck pain. Journal of Physiotherapy 2021; 67(1): 5–11.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphys.2020.12.005

4. Hage R, Detrembleur C, Dierick F, et al. Sensorimotor performance in acute-subacute non-specific neck pain: A non-randomized prospective clinical trial with intervention. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 2021; 22(1): 1017.

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04876-4

5. Skillgate E, Pico-Espinosa OJ, Côté P, et al. Effectiveness of deep tissue massage therapy, and supervised strengthening and stretching exercises for subacute or persistent disabling neck pain. The Stockholm Neck (STONE) randomized controlled trial. Musculoskeletal Science and Practice 2020; 45: 102070.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msksp.2019.102070

6. Joshi S, Balthillaya G, Neelapala YR. Immediate effects of cervicothoracic junction mobilization versus thoracic manipulation on the range of motion and pain in mechanical neck pain with cervicothoracic junction dysfunction: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Chiropractic & Manual Therapies 2020; 28(1): 38.

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12998-020-00327-4

7. Saddique M, Bhutto MA, Jahangir S, et al. Effectiveness of thoracic manipulation and cervicothoracic mobilisation in decreasing pain and increasing ROM in nonspecific neck pain. Pakistan Journal of Medical & Health Sciences 2022; 16(12): 592.

https://doi.org/10.53350/pjmhs20221612592

8. Kay A, Grimsby O. Mobilization/manipulation of the cervical and thoracic spine (techniques). In book: Foundations of Orthopedic Physical Therapy: Routledge; 2023: 437–51.

https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003524212-20

9. Sun X, Chai L, Huang Q, et al. Effects of exercise combined with cervicothoracic spine self-mobilization on chronic non-specific neck pain. Scientific Reports 2024; 14(1): 5298.

https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-55181-8

10. Ghan GM, Babu VS. Immediate effect of cervico-thoracic mobilization on deep neck flexors strength in individuals with forward head posture: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy 2021; 29(3): 147–57.

https://doi.org/10.1080/10669817.2020.1834321

11. Elmelhat AM, Abdelmagid SF, Gomaa EF, Gad AM. Changes in rotator cuff strength ratio, shoulder pain, and disability after cervicothoracic mobilization in subjects with shoulder impingement syndrome. Polish Journal of Physiotherapy 2020; 20(1): 36–42.

12. Watthanasuwakul M, Hanphitakphong P, Poomsalood S. Efficacy of ultrasound therapy with neck retraction exercises vs. ultrasound therapy with deep cervical flexor training for excessive screen time users: a pilot randomized controlled study. Journal of Physical Therapy Science 2024; 36(5): 303–307. https://doi.org/10.1589/jpts.36.303

13. Zhang Y, Lin W, Yi M, et al. Effect of long-term cervical extensor exercise program on functional disability, pain intensity, range of motion, cervical muscle mass, and cervical curvature in young adult population with chronic non-specific neck pain: a randomized controlled trial. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research 2024; 19(1): 9.

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-023-04487-w

14. Zemadanis K. The short and mid-term effects of the Mulligan concept in patients with chronic mechanical neck pain. Journal of Novel Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation 2018; 2: 22–35.

https://doi.org/10.29328/journal.jnpr.1001018

15. Aydoğmuş H, Şenocak Ö, Döner SM, Keskinoğlu P. Investigation of the effectiveness of neck stabilization exercises in patients with chronic neck pain: A randomized, single-blind clinical, controlled study. Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2022; 68(3): 364–371.

https://doi.org/10.5606/tftrd.2022.8481

16. Schenk R, Donaldson M, Parent-Nichols J, et al. Effectiveness of cervicothoracic and thoracic manual physical therapy in managing upper quarter disorders–a systematic review. Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy 2022; 30(1): 46–55.

https://doi.org/10.1080/10669817.2021.1923313

17. Zahid S, Dustgir A, Hafeez S. Comparison of short-term effects of thrust manipulation and non-thrust mobilization at cervicothoracic junction in mechanical neck pain. Pakistan Journal of Medical & Health Sciences 2022; 16(02): 1230.

https://doi.org/10.53350/pjmhs221621230

18. Lee SB. The effect of cervical and thoracic joint mobilization on cervical pain, cervical range of motion, and balance in adults with forward neck posture. Journal of Industrial Convergence 2020; 18(2): 27–35.

https://doi.org/10.22678/jic.2020.18.2.027

19. Alshehri SHS, Reddy RS, ALMohiza MA, et al. Influence of cervical muscle strength and pain severity on functional balance and limits of stability in elderly individuals with chronic nonspecific neck pain: a cross-sectional study. BMC Geriatrics 2025; 25(1): 18.

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-024-05670-2

20. Tabassum H, Mariam M, Gondal KS. Comparison of muscle energy technique and facet joint mobilisation in the patient with chronic neck pain: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Pakistan Medical Association 2024; 74(1): 10–15.

https://doi.org/10.47391/JPMA.9206

21. Blanchard L, Goostree S, Duncombe A. Graded exposure and orthopedic manual physical therapy for kinesiophobia and function in chronic temporomandibular dysfunction: A case report. Cranio: The Journal Of Craniomandibular Practice 2022; 40(5): 454–67.

https://doi.org/10.1080/08869634.2020.1779483

22. Reynolds BC. Thrust joint manipulation to the cervical spine in participants with a primary complaint of temporomandibular disorder (tmd): a randomized clinical trial, Nova Southeastern University; 2019.

https://nsuworks.nova.edu/hpd_pt_stuetd/76

23. Gugliotti M, Makofsky HW. Makofsky’s spinal manual therapy: an introduction to soft tissue mobilization, spinal manipulation, therapeutic and home exercises. (3rd ed.). Routledge; 2024.

https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003526537

24. Millas D. Physiotherapy treatment of a patient with chronic lumbar intervertebral disk herniation with radiculopathy. 2015.

25. Kleyn M. The Effect of thoracic spine and posterior rib manipulation on pulmonary function in first year emergency medical care students: University of Johannesburg (South Africa); 2019.

https://hdl.handle.net/10210/412713

26. Groisman S, da Silva LdS, Sanches TRR, et al. Assessment of long-term effects of adding osteopathic manipulative treatment to neck exercises for individuals with non-specific chronic neck pain: a randomized trial. Journal of Chiropractic Medicine 2023; 22(4): 265–74.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcm.2023.10.003

27. Saleh AM, Abdel-Aal NM, Ibrahem OA. Mobilization with movement versus thoracic manipulation on neck proprioception in mechanical neck pain: A randomized controlled study. Journal of Pharmaceutical Negative Results 2023: 3972–80.

https://doi.org/10.47750/pnr.2023.14.03.499

28. Coulter ID, Crawford C, Vernon H, et al. Manipulation and mobilization for treating chronic nonspecific neck pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis for an appropriateness panel. Pain Physician 2019; 22(2): E55.

https://doi.org/10.36076/ppj/2019.22.E55

29. Zaghloul HMS, Ghally SAO, Abdelkhalek MMT, et al. Comparison between upper thoracic spine mobilization and the Ergon technique in the treatment of mechanical neck pain. SPORT TK-EuroAmerican Journal of Sport Sciences 2022; 11(Supp 3): Art 3.

https://doi.org/10.6018/sportk.534471

30. Abbas HI, Kamel RM, Shafei AE, et al. Cervicothoracic junction mobilization versus autogenic muscle energy technique for chronic mechanical neck pain: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy 2025; 33(1): 36–46.

https://doi.org/10.1080/10669817.2024.2384199

31. Seo J, Song C, Shin D. A single-center study comparing the effects of thoracic spine manipulation vs mobility exercises in 26 office workers with chronic neck pain: a randomized controlled clinical study. Medical Science Monitor: International Medical Journal of Experimental and Clinical Research 2022; 28: e937316.

https://doi.org/10.12659/MSM.937316

32. Elkeblawy MA, Hassan IM, Elshebawy H, et al. Effect of Mulligan’s mobilization with arm movement combined with conventional treatment on pain and cervical rom in patients with unilateral cervical radiculopathy. Egyptian Reviews for Medical and Health Sciences 2025; 5(1): 22–31.

https://doi.org/10.21608/ERMHS.2025.373589.1052

33. Barbosa‐Silva J, Luc A, Sobral de Oliveira‐Souza AI, et al. The Effectiveness of Mulligan’s Techniques in Non‐Specific Neck Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis. Physiotherapy Research International 2025; 30(3): e70045.

https://doi.org/10.1002/pri.70045

Downloads

Published

30-03-2026

Issue

Section

Research Article

Categories

How to Cite

1.
Shafaqat Z, Aslam S, Liaquat F, Manzoor A, Subhani FUR, Saeed Z. Effects of Cervicothoracic Self-Mobilization Along with Conservative Treatment in Subacute Neck Pain: Randomized Controlled Trial. HJPRS [Internet]. 2026 Mar. 30 [cited 2026 Jan. 16];6(1):30-9. Available from: https://thehealerjournal.com/index.php/templates/article/view/585

Share

Similar Articles

1-10 of 218

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)