The Healer Journal of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation Sciences
https://thehealerjournal.com/index.php/templates
<p>The Healer Journal of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation Sciences is an international, open-access, peer-reviewed, HEC recognised journal that has strived to make science widely available so that physiotherapy can heal, rehabilitate, transform society, and positively impact people's lives. The Healer Journal is committed to applying scientific knowledge and encourages evidence-based practice to improve health and advance human progress. In our issues and online first content, we publish some of the best healing sciences, from the best scientists and therapists worldwide, providing an unparalleled global reach and impact on health. The aim is to improve the implementation of research findings into clinical physical therapy and practice.</p> <p><strong>Aims and Scope</strong></p> <p>The Healer Journal of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation Sciences (THJPRS) is an official Journal of "Physio Rehab and Research Center (Pvt) Ltd” and is managed, funded, and published by Physio Rehab and Research Center (Pvt) Ltd. The Healer Journal of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation Sciences is a monthly, open-access, double-blind peer-reviewed international, HEC recognised journal that has strived to make science widely available so that physiotherapy can heal, rehabilitate, transform society, and positively impact people's lives. The Healer Journal is committed to applying scientific knowledge and encourages evidence-based practice to improve health and advance human progress. In our issues and online first content, we publish some of the best healing sciences, from the best scientists and therapists worldwide, providing an unparalleled global reach and impact on health. The aim is to improve the implementation of research findings into clinical physical therapy and practice. A highly-cited, multi-disciplinary, international editorial board provides reviews on the issue articles and assures timely publication of issues.</p> <p><strong>Scope of Journal</strong></p> <p>The Healer Journal of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation Sciences published by Physio Rehab and Research Center follows the whole publication process in accordance with HEC rules & guidelines and international standards of research journals. Journal will use Open Journal System (OJS) for all communications and publication processes to ensure transparency, integrity, and efficiency. Journal will aim to be indexed by international indexing agencies including Web of Science and SCOPUS as per HEC guidelines. The Journal has its Editorial and Advisory Board. The Editorial Board is comprised of Chief Editor, Editor, Managing Editor, and Assistant Editor. While the Advisory Board is comprised of reputed national and international subject specialists with research expertise.</p> <p><strong>Types of articles</strong></p> <ul> <li>Research papers</li> <li>Short communications</li> <li>Review or mini-reviews</li> <li>Commentaries</li> <li>Perspectives, opinion</li> <li>Meta-analysis</li> <li>Case reports</li> <li>Case studies</li> <li>Case-control studies</li> </ul> <p><strong>Approved & recommended by HEC</strong></p> <p>Our Journal was approved and recommended by the Higher Education Commission of Pakistan (HRJS journal recognition system) 2024-2025</p> <p><strong>ISSN (Print): 2791-0784</strong></p> <p><strong>ISSN (Online): 2791-0792</strong></p> <p><strong>Published by:</strong> Physio Rehab and Research Center (Pvt) Ltd</p> <p><strong>Information for Authors</strong></p> <p>The Healer Journal of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation Sciences is a world-leading physiotherapy journal and invites submissions of any original contribution that advances or illuminates physiotherapy science or practice or educates or entertains the journal’s readers. We prioritize publishing research articles, randomized controlled trials, meta-analyses, systematic reviews, epidemiological studies, case reports, guest editorials, comments, correspondence, and additional perspectives. For more information on the types of papers and manuscript requirements please read the <a href="http://thehealerjournal.com/index.php/templates/Guidelines">Guidelines for Authors</a>.</p> <p><strong>Manuscript Submission</strong></p> <p>To submit your manuscripts to The Healer Journal please visit <a href="https://www.thehealerjournal.com"><strong>https://www.thehealerjournal.com</strong></a> Manuscripts must be solely the work of the author(s) stated, must not have been previously published elsewhere, and must not be under consideration by another journal. Research scripts can be sent to <a href="mailto:editor@thehealerjournal.com">editor@thehealerjournal.com</a></p>Physio Rehab and Research Centeren-USThe Healer Journal of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation Sciences2791-0784<p>CC BY</p>Thoracic Mobilization Versus Sling-Based Thoracic Active Exercises on Pain, Function and Quality of Life in Patients with Non-specific Neck Pain
https://thehealerjournal.com/index.php/templates/article/view/292
<p><strong>Background:</strong> Non-specific neck pain is the type of neck pain which has no pathognomonic signs and symptoms or has no underlying condition<strong>. </strong>It is estimated that 70% of the population may suffer from non-specific neck pain at some point in their life. <strong>Objective:</strong> To find out the effects of thoracic mobilization versus sling-based thoracic active exercises on pain, function and quality of life in patients with non-specific neck pain. <strong>Methods:</strong> This randomized trial was conducted at the Physiotherapy Department of the University of Lahore Teaching Hospital. Participants aged 20 to 45 years, diagnosed patients of non-specific neck pain were included in the study. Patients with any neurological disease, previous surgical history, pregnancy, or cardiac disease were excluded. Group A performed cervical manual therapy for and sling-based active thoracic exercises. While Group B performed cervical manual therapy and thoracic mobilization. A numeric pain rating scale, neck disability index and short form-36 questionnaire were used to measure pain, function and quality of life respectively. Mann-Whitney U and Friedman tests were applied to identify within-group differences in both groups. <strong>Results:</strong> The mean rank for pain score in group A at the baseline was 31.42 and in group B 21.58 with a Z value of -2.437 and a p-value is 0.015. At the end of the treatment 4<sup>th</sup> week, the mean rank for pain in group A was 16.65 and in group B 36.35 with a Z value of -4.851 and a p-value is 0.00. The mean rank for neck disability index score in group A at the baseline was 27.94 and in group B 25.06 with a Z value of -1.158 and p-value is 0.247. At the end of the treatment 4<sup>th</sup> week, the mean rank for disability score in-group A was 22.50 and in-group B 30.50 with a Z value of -3.045 and a p-value is 0.02. <strong>Conclusion:</strong> Both groups showed significant improvements but Group A had more pronounced effects. Thoracic mobilization provides faster short-term relief but the active nature of sling-based exercises offers more sustainable benefits in long-term management of pain and patient wellbeing.</p>Samer ZehraMuhammad SarfrazHafsa ChandioIqra WaseemAyesha NaeemAmjed Ali
Copyright (c) 2025 The Healer Journal of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation Sciences
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
2024-12-302024-12-30461810.55735/hjprs.v4i6.292Effects of Different Aerobic Exercise Protocols on Depression in Patients with Myocardial Infarction
https://thehealerjournal.com/index.php/templates/article/view/291
<p><strong>Background:</strong> Depression is common among patients recovering from myocardial infarction and is associated with poor outcomes. Aerobic exercise has been proposed as a beneficial intervention for improving cardiovascular and mental health. <strong>Objective:</strong> To evaluate the effects of various aerobic exercise protocols on depression in patients with myocardial infarction. <strong>Methodology:</strong> In this randomized controlled trial, 50 patients recovering from myocardial infarction were taken from various cardiac hospitals in Karachi, Pakistan over six months and randomly assigned to one of three exercise groups: low, moderate, and high-intensity interval training. The sample includes both male and female patients aged 40 to 65 years and those recovering from myocardial infarction. Depressive symptoms were assessed using the Beck Depression Inventory at baseline, 6<sup>th</sup> and 12<sup>th</sup> week post-intervention. Exercise adherence and safety were monitored throughout the study. A demographic proforma/myocardial infarction Checklist was used to gather data on patients' age, gender, occupation, and details related to their medical history and the severity of their myocardial infarction. Descriptive statistics were used to summarise demographics and depression scores, while inferential statistics, such as t-tests or chi-square tests, were applied to explore the relationships between exercise intervention and depressive symptoms. <strong>Results:</strong> A significant reduction in depressive symptoms was observed in all exercise groups, with the high-intensity interval training group showing the greatest improvement in depression scores compared to the low and moderate-intensity groups. Exercise adherence rates were highest in the moderate-intensity group, while high-intensity interval training demonstrated the most significant physiological improvements in cardiovascular fitness. <strong>Conclusion:</strong> Aerobic exercise, particularly high-intensity interval training, appears to be an effective intervention for reducing depressive symptoms in patients recovering from myocardial infarction. Incorporating structured aerobic exercise into recovery programs may enhance both psychological and physical health outcomes.</p>Hina SaeedMuhammad JawaidSaadia PerwaizSobia HasanAasma BasitNisha Lohana
Copyright (c) 2025 The Healer Journal of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation Sciences
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
2024-12-302024-12-304691510.55735/hjprs.v4i6.291 Assessment of Gluteus Maximus and Medius Weakness in Postpartum Females with Pelvic Pain
https://thehealerjournal.com/index.php/templates/article/view/280
<p><strong>Background:</strong><strong> </strong>In postpartum females, pelvic pain is a common issue that can significantly impact daily functioning and quality of life. Weakness in the gluteus maximus and medius muscles impacts pelvic stability and movement and may cause pain. <strong>Objective:</strong> To assess gluteus maximus and medius weakness in postpartum females with pelvic pain. <strong>Methodology:</strong> This cross-sectional study was done on 196 postpartum females. Data was collected from different hospitals in Lahore. Participants with an age range above 18 years who had postpartum in the previous three months were selected for this study. Participants with any history of trauma, cancer, disability or any prior history of pelvic floor muscle tear of grade 3 or 4 were excluded. Data was collected using a visual analogue scale, Trendelenburg test, and hip-prone extension test. The quantitative variables were present as mean and standard deviation, range and histogram. Categorical variables were presented as frequencies, percentages, cross-tabulation, bar charts and pie charts. The chi-square test was applied to see the association between categorical variables. <strong>Results:</strong> The mean age of participants was 29.36±4.37. The Trendelenburg sign test revealed that 74.5% of participants showed positive results on the right leg side and 69.4% showed positive results on the left leg side. Additionally, 34.7% of participants exhibited positive results on the hip-prone extension test for the right gluteus maximus, while 37.2% showed positive results for the left gluteus maximus. The visual analogue scale indicated that varying degrees of pain were reported by participants, with 10.7% reporting no pain and 17.3% reporting the worst possible pain. Mild to severe pain levels were reported by the remaining participants. Significant associations were found between gluteus medius and gluteus maximus weakness with gravida, as well as pelvic pain, for the right leg (p<0.05). <strong>Conclusion:</strong> The study concludes that there is an association between gluteus medius and gluteus maximus muscle weakness in postpartum females with pelvic pain.</p>Tamknat IlyasRabia JawaRabia Abdul MajeedSaba RiazSyeda Marukh GillaniNida Hamid
Copyright (c) 2025 The Healer Journal of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation Sciences
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
2024-12-302024-12-3046162110.55735/hjprs.v4i6.280