Effects of Non-Immersive Virtual Reality and Conventional Physical Therapy in Patients with Tennis Elbow

Hamad Nasar; Muhammad Naveed  Babur; Muhammad  Sanaullah; Talha  Ahmad; Kinza  Arif; Shahroz  Qayyum

doi:10.55735/3vap0195

Authors

Hamad Nasar Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, Superior University, Lahore, Pakistan https://orcid.org/0009-0003-1570-377X
Muhammad Naveed Babur Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, Superior University, Lahore, Pakistan
Muhammad Sanaullah Faculty of Rehabilitation & Allied Health Sciences, Riphah International University, Sahiwal, Pakistan
Talha Ahmad Faculty of Rehabilitation & Allied Health Sciences, Riphah International University, Lahore, Pakistan https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9398-5210
Kinza Arif Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, Superior University, Lahore, Pakistan
Shahroz Qayyum Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, Superior University, Lahore, Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55735/3vap0195

Keywords:

Conventional physical therapy , Lateral epicondylitis , Musculoskeletal rehabilitation , Non-immersive virtual reality, Tennis elbow

Abstract

Background: Lateral epicondylitis, or tennis elbow, is a common musculoskeletal disorder marked by pain and tenderness along the lateral elbow. It is frequently caused by repetitive forearm and wrist movements, affecting athletes and individuals in occupations with similar strain. Objective: To compare the effects of non-immersive virtual reality therapy with conventional physiotherapy in patients with tennis elbow. Methodology: A randomised controlled trial was conducted at SARAM Hospital, Azad Kashmir, Pakistan. Forty participants aged 18 to 45 years with a diagnosis of tennis elbow lasting at least six weeks and no prior active treatment in the past six months were included. Participants were randomly assigned to a virtual reality-based intervention group (n=21) or a conventional physiotherapy group (n=19). The virtual reality group performed structured exercises designed to reduce pain and improve function, while the control group received standard physiotherapy. Outcomes included pain intensity, grip strength, functional status, and assessor-rated improvement, measured at baseline and after intervention. Results: Both groups demonstrated significant pain reduction. Paired sample t-test showed notable improvements within the conventional group (p<0.00). An independent sample t-test revealed superior results in the virtual reality group compared to controls (p=0.000). The negative mean differences for virtual reality activities like bicep curls (-3.23), shoulder presses (-2.81), and wrist curls/extensions (-3.42) indicated greater pain reduction. Functional assessment with the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand and patient-rated tennis elbow evaluation questionnaires showed larger mean improvement in the virtual reality group, reflecting enhanced arm function and decreased disability relative to standard therapy. Conclusion: Non-immersive virtual reality therapy was more effective than conventional physiotherapy in alleviating pain and improving function in patients with tennis elbow. Better compliance and engagement with virtual reality exercises may account for the enhanced outcomes. Younger participants benefited most, suggesting virtual reality can be a valuable addition to rehabilitation programs, pending confirmation from long-term studies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Tosti R, Jennings J, Sewards JM. Lateral epicondylitis of the elbow. The American Journal of Medicine 2013; 126(4): 357. e1-. e6.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2012.09.018 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2012.09.018

2. Malliaras P, Cook JL, Kent P. Reduced ankle dorsiflexion range may increase the risk of patellar tendon injury among volleyball players. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport 2006; 9(4): 304-9.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsams.2006.03.015 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsams.2006.03.015

3. Mafi N, Lorentzon R, Alfredson H. Superior short‐term results with eccentric calf muscle training compared to concentric training in a randomized prospective multicenter study on patients with chronic Achilles tendinosis. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 2001; 9(1): 42-7.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s001670000148 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s001670000148

4. Bisset L, Beller E, Jull G, Brooks P, Darnell R, Vicenzino B. Mobilisation with movement and exercise, corticosteroid injection, or wait and see for tennis elbow: randomised trial. BMJ 2006; 333(7575): 939.

https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.38961.584653.AE DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.38961.584653.AE

5. Kjaer M. Role of extracellular matrix in adaptation of tendon and skeletal muscle to mechanical loading. Physiological Reviews 2004; 84(2): 649-98.

https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.00031.2003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.00031.2003

6. Algafly AA, George KP. The effect of cryotherapy on nerve conduction velocity, pain threshold and pain tolerance. British Journal of Sports Medicine 2007; 41(6): 365-9.

https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsm.2006.031237 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsm.2006.031237

7. Tsai W-C, Tang S-T, Liang F-C. Effect of therapeutic ultrasound on tendons. American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation 2011; 90(12): 1068-73.

https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0b013e31821a70be DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0b013e31821a70be

8. Eraslan L, Yuce D, Erbilici A, Baltaci G. Does Kinesiotaping improve pain and functionality in patients with newly diagnosed lateral epicondylitis? Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 2018; 26(3): 938-45.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-017-4691-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-017-4691-7

9. Benjamin M, Kaiser E, Milz S. Structure-function relationships in tendons: a review. Journal of Anatomy. 2008; 212(3): 211-28.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7580.2008.00864.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7580.2008.00864.x

10. Zhang C, Yu S. Technology to Enhance Patient Motivation in Virtual Reality Rehabilitation: A Review. Games for Health Journal 2024; 13(4): 215-33.

https://doi.org/10.1089/g4h.2023.0069 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/g4h.2023.0069

11. Weiss PL, Rand D, Katz N, Kizony R. Video capture virtual reality as a flexible and effective rehabilitation tool. Journal of Neuroengineering and Rehabilitation 2004; 1: 1-12.

https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-1-12 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-1-12

12. Holden MK. Virtual environments for motor rehabilitation. Cyberpsychology & Behavior 2005; 8(3): 187-211.

https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2005.8.187 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2005.8.187

13. Pietrzak E, Cotea C, Pullman S. Using commercial video games for upper limb stroke rehabilitation: is this the way of the future? Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation 2014; 21(2): 152-62.

https://doi.org/10.1310/tsr2102-152 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1310/tsr2102-152

14. Cikajlo I, Rudolf M, Goljar N, Burger H, Matjačić Z. Telerehabilitation using virtual reality task can improve balance in patients with stroke. Disability and Rehabilitation 2012; 34(1): 13-28.

https://doi.org/10.3109/09638288.2011.583308 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/09638288.2011.583308

15. Villiger M, Bohli D, Kiper D, et al. Virtual reality-augmented neurorehabilitation improves motor function and reduces neuropathic pain in patients with incomplete spinal cord injury. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair 2013; 27(8): 675-83.

https://doi.org/10.1177/1545968313490999 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1545968313490999

16. Hayre CM, Muller DJ, Scherer MJ. Virtual reality in health and rehabilitation: CRC Press; 2020: 2-8.

https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429351365-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429351365-1

17. Laver K E, Lange B, George S, Deutsch J E, Saposnik G, & Crotty M. Virtual reality for stroke rehabilitation. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2017; 11(11): CD008349.

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD008349.pub4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD008349.pub4

18. Abutalebi H R, Momenzadeh H. Performance Improvement of TDOA-Based Speaker Localization in Joint Noisy and Reverberant Conditions. EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing 2011; 62139.

https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/621390 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/621390

19. Namdari S, Zmistowski B, Omid R. The Foundations of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery: CRC Press; 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003524243

20. Levin MF. Conference AIFI 2017. Therapeutic Exercise: Foundations, Evidences and Clinical Reasoning in Physiotherapy Practice. Archives of Physiotherapy 2019; 9(1): S1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40945-019-0069-0

https://doi.org/10.1186_s40945-019-0069-0

21. Lee S, Chae D-S, Song B-W, et al. ADSC-based cell therapies for musculoskeletal disorders: a review of recent clinical trials. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2021; 22(19): 10586.

https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms221910586 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms221910586

22. Álvarez de la Campa Crespo M, Donegan T, Amestoy-Alonso B, Just A, Combalía A, Sanchez-Vives MV. Virtual embodiment for improving range of motion in patients with movement-related shoulder pain: an experimental study. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research 2023; 18(1): 729.

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-023-04158-w DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-023-04158-w

23. Saposnik G, Teasell R, Mamdani M, et al. Effectiveness of virtual reality using Wii gaming technology in stroke rehabilitation: a pilot randomized clinical trial and proof of principle. Stroke 2010; 41(7): 1477-84.

https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.584979 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.584979

24. Alexander L, Shim J, Harrison I, et al. Exercise therapy for tendinopathy: a scoping review mapping interventions and outcomes. 2021.

https://doi.org/10.51224/SRXIV.90 DOI: https://doi.org/10.51224/SRXIV.90

25. Franke M, Weenink M, Hegeman M, Gerritsen D, Bode C, Vonkeman H E. The Feasibility Of Virtual Reality Supported Exercise Therapy For Axial Spondyloarthritis In A Home And A Physiotherapy Setting: A Mixed Methods Study From A Multi-Disciplinary Perspective. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases 2024; 83(Sup1): 1204.

https://doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2024-eular.2187 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2024-eular.2187

26. Brady N, McVeigh JG, McCreesh K, Rio E, Dekkers T, Lewis JS. Exploring the effectiveness of immersive Virtual Reality interventions in the management of musculoskeletal pain: A state-of-the-art review. Physical Therapy Reviews 2021; 26(1): 1-14.

https://doi.org/10.1080/10833196.2021.1903209 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10833196.2021.1903209

27. Aderinto N, Olatunji G, Kokori E, et al. The Effectiveness of Virtual Reality Therapy in Improving Motor Function and Quality of Life among Children with Cerebral Palsy. Current Treatment Options in Pediatrics 2025; 11(1): 1-20.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s40746-024-00317-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40746-024-00317-1