Comparative Effects of Thoracolumbar Manipulation versus Abdominal Massage on Functional Constipation and Quality of Life

Muhammad Muneeb Jafar; Muhammad Hasaan Umar Butt; Tooba Zahra; Adiba Jaffar; Maham Gull; Maryam Farooq

doi:10.55735/vg6b1940

Authors

Muhammad Muneeb Jafar Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Faisalabad, Faisalabad, Pakistan
Muhammad Hasaan Umar Butt Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Faisalabad, Faisalabad, Pakistan
Tooba Zahra Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Faisalabad, Faisalabad, Pakistan
Adiba Jaffar Institute of Physical Therapy & Rehabilitation, Jinnah Sindh Medical University, Karachi, Pakistan
Maham Gull Jafar Physiotherapy Clinic, Faisalabad, Pakistan
Maryam Farooq Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Faisalabad, Faisalabad, Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55735/vg6b1940

Keywords:

Abdominal massage, Functional constipation, Spinal manipulation

Abstract

Background: Functional constipation is a chronic constipation without any aetiology. Rome IV criteria defined functional constipation as having hard or lumpy stools, excessive straining during defecation, less than three bowel movements per week and an obstructive feeling during evacuation. Pathophysiology of functional constipation includes eating disorders, physical inactivity, fibre-deficient diet, family history and behavioural factors like stool withholding attitude. Physical therapy interventions can play a vital role in relieving functional constipation and improving quality of life. Objective: To investigate the comparative effects of thoracolumbar manipulation versus abdominal massage on functional constipation and quality of life. Methodology: This double-blinded, randomised controlled trial was conducted in the independent hospital physiotherapy department of Faisalabad with concealed allocation. A consecutive sample of 40 patients with functional constipation based on Rome IV criteria was taken. Patients were referred from gastroenterologists and general physicians and were randomly allocated by a universal lottery method to group A (lower thoracic-lumber manipulation, 3 sessions per week) and group B (abdominal massage for 15 minutes, 3 sessions per week). The Constipation Scoring System and Patient Assessment of Constipation Quality of Life Questionnaire were evaluated at baseline, 2 weeks, and 4 weeks after treatment. A total of 12 sessions in 4 weeks were provided to patients. Data was analysed by using non-parametric tests, Kruskal-Wallis Test and Friedman Test and SPSS version 25. Results: The age of the participants in both groups was the mean and standard deviations (29.23±3.23). Within-group analysis showed a significant relationship in both groups (Group A manipulation and Group B abdominal massage) (p<0.05). Constipation scoring system and patient assessment of constipation showed significant value (p<0.00), indicating that statistically significant relation between both groups. Conclusion: This study concluded that abdominal massage is a superior method to deal with functional constipation patients as compared to Maitland lower thoracolumbar manipulations.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Bharucha AE, Lacy BE. Mechanisms, evaluation, and management of chronic constipation. Gastroenterology 2020; 158(5): 1232–49. e3. DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.12.034 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2019.12.034

2. Forootan M, Bagheri N, Darvishi M. Chronic constipation: A review of literature. Medicine 2018; 97(20): e10631. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000010631 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000010631

3. Gibbons D, Camilleri M, Nelson AD, Eckert D. Characteristics of chronic megacolon among patients diagnosed with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2 B. United European Gastroenterology Journal 2016; 4(3): 449–54. DOI: 10.1177/2050640615611630 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2050640615611630

4. Levy EI, Lemmens R, Vandenplas Y, Devreker T. Functional constipation in children: challenges and solutions. Pediatric Health, Medicine and Therapeutics 2017: 19–27. DOI: 10.2147/PHMT.S110940 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/PHMT.S110940

5. Belvaux A, Bouchoucha M, Benamouzig R. Osteopathic management of chronic constipation in women patients. Results of a pilot study. Clinics and Research in Hepatology and Gastroenterology 2017; 41(5): 602–11. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinre.2016.12.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinre.2016.12.003

6. Cai Q, Buono JL, Spalding WM, et al. Healthcare costs among patients with chronic constipation: a retrospective claims analysis in a commercially insured population. Journal of Medical Economics 2014; 17(2): 148–58. DOI: 10.3111/13696998.2013.860375 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3111/13696998.2013.860375

7. Ge X, Zhao W, Ding C, et al. Potential role of faecal microbiota from patients with slow transit constipation in the regulation of gastrointestinal motility. Scientific Reports 2017; 7(1): 441. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-00612-y DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-00612-y

8. Tomita T, Kazumori K, Baba K, Zhao X, Chen Y, Miwa H. Impact of chronic constipation on health‐related quality of life and work productivity in Japan. Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology 2021; 36(6): 1529–37. DOI: 10.1111/jgh 15295 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jgh.15295

9. Hayat M, Zia H, Nusrat S. Lubiprostone in the treatment of chronic idiopathic constipation: an update on health-related quality of life and patient-reported outcomes. Patient Related Outcome Measures 2019: 43–7. DOI: 10.2147/PROM.S157905 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/PROM.S157905

10. Bellini M, Usai-Satta P, Bove A, et al. Chronic constipation diagnosis and treatment evaluation: the “CHRO. CO. DI. TE” study. BMC Gastroenterology 2017; 17: 1–11. DOI: 10.1186/s12876-016-0556-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-016-0556-7

11. Waqas S, Ahmad A, Ahmad S, Shafi T, Shahid HA. Comparison of Maitland Thoracic Spine Manipulation Versus Maitland Cervical Spine Mobilisation in Chronic Unilateral C6 â€“C7 Cervical Radiculopathy. Annals of King Edward Medical University 2016; 22(2). DOI:10.21649/akemu.v22i2.1285 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21649/akemu.v22i2.1285

12. Rubinstein SM, De Zoete A, Van Middelkoop M, Assendelft WJ, De Boer MR, Van Tulder MW. Benefits and harms of spinal manipulative therapy for the treatment of chronic low back pain: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ 2019; 364. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.l689 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l689

13. Field T. Massage therapy research review. Complementary therapies in clinical practice 2016; 24: 19–31. DOI: 10.1016/j.ctcp.2016.04.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctcp.2016.04.005

14. Gasibat Q, Suwehli W. Determining the benefits of massage mechanisms: A review of literature. Rehabilitation Sciences 2017; 3(2): 58–67. DOI: 10.11648/j.rs.20170203.12

15. Vasanthi V. A study to assess the effectiveness of abdominal massage with aroma oil (Lavender Oil) for relieving constipation among bedridden subjects admitted in selected wards at Rajiv Gandhi Government General Hospital, Chennai: College of Nursing, Madras Medical College, Chennai; 2014. DOI: 10.1016/j.explore.2022.08.010 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.explore.2022.08.010

16. Turan N, Ast TA. The effect of abdominal massage on constipation and quality of life. Gastroenterology Nursing 2016; 39(1): 48–59. DOI: 10.1097/SGA.0000000000000202 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/SGA.0000000000000202

17. Uysal N. The effect of abdominal massage administered by caregivers on gastric complications occurring in patients intermittent enteral feeding–a randomised controlled trial. European Journal of Integrative Medicine 2017; 10: 75–81. DOI:10.1016/j.eujim.2017.01.014 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eujim.2017.01.014

18. Mokhtare M, Karimi S, Bahardoust M, Sotoudeheian M, Ghazi A, Babaei-Ghazani A. How adding the abdominal massage to polyethylene glycol can improve symptom and quality of life in patients with functional constipation in comparison with each one of the treatment modalities alone: A randomised clinical trial. Complementary Therapies in Medicine 2020; 52: 102495. DOI: 10.1016/j.ctim.2020.102495 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctim.2020.102495

19. Gürsen C, Günel MK, Kaya S, Kav T, Akbayrak T. Effect of connective tissue manipulation on symptoms and quality of life in patients with chronic constipation: a randomised controlled trial. Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics 2015; 38(5): 335–43. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2015.06.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmpt.2015.06.003

20. Thomas LE, Browning MC. Positive chiropractic treatment outcome of chronic constipation in a 2-year-old male: a case report. Journal of Clinical Chiropractic Paediatrics: 1410.

21. Sinclair M. The use of abdominal massage to treat chronic constipation. Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies 2011; 15(4): 436–45. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2010.07.007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbmt.2010.07.007

22. Aquino A, Perini M, Cosmai S, et al. Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment Limits Chronic Constipation in a Child with Pitt‐Hopkins Syndrome. Case Reports in Paediatrics 2017; 2017(1): 5437830. DOI: 10.1155/2017/5437830 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/5437830

23. McClurg D, Hagen S, Hawkins S, Lowe-Strong A. Abdominal massage for the alleviation of constipation symptoms in people with multiple sclerosis: a randomised controlled feasibility study. Multiple Sclerosis Journal 2011; 17(2): 223–33. DOI: 10.1177/1352458510384899 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1352458510384899