Comparative Efficacy of Muscle Energy Technique and Myofascial Release Technique in Reducing Pain in Upper Cross Syndrome: A Randomised Clinical Trial
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55735/m1s63z03Keywords:
Muscle energy techniques, Myofascial release , Numeric pain rating scale, Upper cross syndromeAbstract
Background: Upper cross syndrome is a common postural imbalance marked by neck, shoulder, and upper back pain due to muscular dysfunction. Manual therapy techniques like muscle energy techniques and myofascial release are widely used for managing musculoskeletal pain. Objective: To compare the effects of myofascial release and muscle energy techniques in patients with upper cross syndrome. Methodology: The randomised clinical trial included 54 participants with upper cross syndrome at three hospitals in Faisalabad over four months, divided into two groups of 27, with a 20% attrition rate. Participants were selected using purposive sampling, with inclusion criteria consisting of both genders, age 20-60 years, diagnosis of UCS, pain intensity of 4 to 7 on the Numerical Pain Rating Scale, and duration of neck pain of 4 to 12 weeks. Exclusion criteria included rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, cervical radiculopathy, recent trauma to the cervical spine, cancer, history of cervical spine surgery in the last 12 months, and fracture. Group A received the muscle energy techniques on the cervical region, involving 5 repetitions and a 20-second hold for each, while Group B received the myofascial release for 30-40 seconds. Measurements were taken at baseline and the end of the 4th week, with 3 sessions per week on alternate days for one month. Outcome measures included primary outcome measures of pain intensity and cervical range of motion, and secondary outcome measures of functional disability using the Neck Disability Index. Non-parametric tests, including the Wilcoxon signed-rank test and Mann-Whitney U test, were applied. Results: Group A consisted of 14 males and 8 females, while Group B contained 15 males and 7 females. Intra-group analysis utilising the Wilcoxon signed-rank test found that both groups experienced considerable pain reduction. Group A had a significant decrease in pain levels (p<0.00) after MET. Similarly, Group B saw considerable pain reduction (p<0.00) with MRT. Between-group comparisons revealed that the MET group experienced greater pain relief. Conclusion: The muscle energy techniques significantly decreased discomfort, increased neck range of motion, and facilitated functional activities in those with upper cross syndrome as compared to myofascial release.
Downloads
References
1. Muscolino JJJotAT-MS. Upper crossed syndrome. 2015; 21(2).
2. Cheshomi S, Alizadeh MH, Barati AH, Akochakian M. The Effect of Six Weeks Corrective Exercise on Upper-Crossed Syndrome of Overhead Athletes. Journal of Applied Exercise Physiology. 2018; 14(27): 153-66.
3. Chang MC, Choo YJ, Hong K, Boudier-Revéret M, Yang S. Treatment of Upper Crossed Syndrome: A Narrative Systematic Review. Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland). 2023; 11(16). DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11162328
4. Gillani SN, Ain Q, Rehman SU, Masood T. Effects of eccentric muscle energy technique versus static stretching exercises in the management of cervical dysfunction in upper cross syndrome: a randomized control trial. JPMA The Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association. 2020; 70(3): 394-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5455/JPMA.300417
5. Shahid S, Tanveer F, Dustgir A. Prevalence and Risk Factors for the Development of Upper-Crossed Syndrome (UCS) among DPT Students of University of Lahore. International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR). 2015; 5: 768-71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21275/v5i5.NOV163371
6. Seidi F, Bayattork M, Minoonejad H, Andersen LL, Page P. Comprehensive corrective exercise program improves alignment, muscle activation, and movement pattern of men with upper crossed syndrome: randomized controlled trial. Scientific Reports. 2020; 10(1): 20688. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-77571-4
7. Daneshmandi H, Harati J, Fahim S, be P. Bodybuilding links to Upper Crossed Syndrome. 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.16926/par.2017.05.17
8. Islam F, Mansha H, Gulzar K, Raza A, Raffique A, Haider S. Prevalence Of Piriformis Muscle Syndrome Among Individuals with Low Back Pain: Piriformis Muscle Syndrome Among Individuals with Low Back Pain. Pakistan Journal of Health Sciences. 2022: 48-52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54393/pjhs.v3i04.98
9. Franke H, Fryer G, Ostelo RW, Kamper SJ. Muscle energy technique for non-specific low-back pain. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2015; 2015(2): Cd009852. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD009852.pub2
10. Kang Y-H, Ha W-B, Geum J-H, Woo H, Han Y-H, Park S-H, et al. Effect of Muscle Energy Technique on Hamstring Flexibility: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. 2023; 11(8): 1089. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11081089
11. Rana AA, Ahmad A, Gillani SA, Idrees MQ, Awan IJRMJ. Effects of conventional physical therapy with and without muscle energy techniques for treatment of Upper Cross Syndrome. 2020; 45(1): 127-32.
12. Ahmad S, Komal S, Shafique S, Altaim T. Comparison of effectiveness of myofascial trigger point release with manual therapy and myofascial release in combination with self stretching in upper cross syndrome: JRCRS. 2019; 7(1): 3-6. Journal Riphah College of Rehabilitation Sciences. 2019; 7(1): 3-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5455/JRCRS.2019070102
13. Uysal SC, Tüzün EH, Eker L, Angın E. Effectiveness of the muscle energy technique on respiratory muscle strength and endurance in patients with fibromyalgia. Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation. 2019; 32(3): 411-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/BMR-181287
14. Espinosa-López A, Daza J, Pinzón-Sanabria L, Perdomo-Quiroga Y, Ruiz-Jiménez J. Effects of muscle energy technique for quadratus lumborum on respiratory muscle strength in patients with breast cancer. Revista de la Facultad de Medicina. 2019; 67: 469-75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15446/revfacmed.v67n4.68950
15. Ożóg P, Weber-Rajek M, Radzimińska A, Goch A. Analysis of Muscle Activity Following the Application of Myofascial Release Techniques for Low-Back Pain-A Randomized-Controlled Trial. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2021; 10(18). DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10184039
16. Pişirici P, Ekiz M. Original Article Investigation of the acute effect of myofascial release techniques and dynamic stretch on vertical jump performance in recreationally active individuals. Journal of Physical Education and Sport. 2020; 20: 1569-79.
17. Duarte França ME, Botti MdSA, Ide FC, Sinhorim L, Santos GM, do Nascimento IB. Effect of myofascial release techniques on internal biomechanics and their resultant application to sports: A systematic review. Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies. 2024; 40: 525-33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbmt.2024.05.003
18. Sasidharan S. Comparing the effectiveness of muscle energy technique and static stretching in upper crossed syndrome on IT professionals: City University.
19. Irshad A, Khan M, Khan M, Rabia K, Aslam J, Zafar I, et al. Comparison between Static Stretching Exercises and Eccentric Muscle Energy Techniques in Upper Cross Syndrome: Randomized control trial: Static Stretching Exercises and Eccentric Muscle Energy. Pakistan BioMedical Journal. 2022: 190-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54393/pbmj.v5i5.490
20. Shahzad H, Fatima A, Ahmad A, Khan ZA, Gilani SAJRMJ. Effectiveness of routine physical therapy with and without muscle energy technique in patients with upper crossed syndrome. Rawal Medical Journal. 2022; 47(3): 654-.
21. Kashif M, Ayub R, Nawaz S, Hanif N, Shahzadi A, Ullah B, et al. Comparison between Effectiveness of Mets and Static Stretching on Trapezius in Upper Cross Syndrome. Journal of Health and Rehabilitation Research. 2024; 4(2): 525-30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.61919/jhrr.v4i2.841
22. Vispute S, Kumar N. A Comparative Study of Immediate Effects of Myofascial Release Technique and Positional Release Technique on Trapezius among the College Students. International Journal of Physiotherapy and Research. 2022; 10: 4243-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.16965/ijpr.2022.122
23. Khan AK, Jabbar S, Ashraf I, Najeeb M, Fatima N, Javed R, et al. Perception of Physical Therapists of Lahore Regarding Ethical Issues In Clinical Practice; A Cross Sectional Study: Perception of physical therapist regarding ethical issues. Pakistan BioMedical Journal. 2022: 293-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54393/pbmj.v5i5.436
24. Shaukat A, Ahmed K, Shafee I, Shabbir M. Proficiency and Ethical Standards: A Cross-Sectional Survey of Postgraduate Physical Therapy Students at RCRS, Lahore. Journal Riphah College of Rehabilitation Sciences. 2024; 12(3). DOI: https://doi.org/10.53389/JRCRS.2024120302
25. Zutshi K, Verma P, Hazari A. Effectiveness of Myofascial Release in Improving Pain, Pain Pressure Threshold and Disability as Compared with Standard Care in Upper Trapezius Myofascial Trigger Points. Indian Journal of Physiotherapy and Occupational Therapy - An International Journal. 2022; 15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37506/ijpot.v15i3.16161
26. Senthil P. Effectiveness of Myofascial Release Technique and Muscle Energy Technique on Pain and Physical Function among Smartphone Users with Trapezitis. Chettinad Health City Medical Journal. 2022; 11(04): 37-41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24321/2278.2044.202238
Downloads
Published
License
Copyright (c) 2025 The Healer Journal of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation Sciences
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
