Comparative Effectiveness of Neural Mobilization with and without Breathing Reeducation on Strength and Endurance of Deep Neck Flexors in Cervical Radiculopathy

Ramiza Khalid; Areeba Bukhtiar; Fasiha Manzoor; Hoorain Hassan; Haram Fatima; Alishwa Naeem

doi:10.55735/86m6sr02

Authors

Ramiza Khalid College of Physical Therapy, Government College University, Faisalabad, Pakistan
Areeba Bukhtiar College of Physical Therapy, Government College University, Faisalabad, Pakistan
Fasiha Manzoor College of Physical Therapy, Government College University, Faisalabad, Pakistan
Hoorain Hassan College of Physical Therapy, Government College University, Faisalabad, Pakistan
Haram Fatima College of Physical Therapy, Government College University, Faisalabad, Pakistan
Alishwa Naeem College of Physical Therapy, Government College University, Faisalabad, Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55735/86m6sr02

Keywords:

Breathing re-education Neurodynamics Neurological dysfunction Pinched nerve Radiating pain

Abstract

Background: Cervical radiculopathy is a condition of the cervical spine characterized by compression or irritation of the cervical nerve roots due to various pathological causes. It commonly results in radicular symptoms such as pain, numbness, paresthesia, and muscle weakness in the upper limbs. The condition often leads to functional limitations, psychological distress, and decreased quality of life. Objective: To evaluate the comparative effectiveness of neural mobilization combined with breathing reeducation versus neural mobilization alone on improving the strength and endurance of deep neck flexor muscles in individuals diagnosed with cervical radiculopathy. Methodology: A quasi-experimental study was conducted in the department of physiotherapy, Allied Hospital, Faisalabad, for three months from December 2024 to February 2025. About 40 participants having positive spurling test and Grade 2 strength of cervical flexors, were included in this trial. The participants who had hypertension, malignancy, cervical ribs and those who underwent cervical surgery were excluded. Pain intensity, range of motion, strength of cervical flexors and endurance were assessed through neck disability index, goniometer, manual muscle testing and deep neck flexors endurance test respectively, for pre and post-intervention. Group A received neural mobilization in addition to breathing re-education, while Group B received only neural mobilization. Mean and standard deviation of all variables were calculated. The obtained data were analyzed using a paired-sample t-test. Results: Group A demonstrated statistically significant improvements, with p-values <0.00 for visual analogue scale, manual muscle testing, range of motion, and deep neck flexor endurance. In contrast, Group B showed significant improvement only in pain score and deep neck flexor endurance (p=0.04), while changes in manual muscle testing (p=0.08) and range of motion (p=0.16) were not statistically significant. Conclusion: The combination of neural mobilization with breathing re-education is more effective than neural mobilization alone in enhancing pain relief, muscle strength, range of motion, and endurance of deep neck flexors in patients with cervical radiculopathy.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Kim D-G, Chung SH, Jung HB. The effects of neural mobilization on cervical radiculopathy patients’ pain, disability, ROM, and deep flexor endurance. Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation. 2017; 30(5): 951-9.

https://doi.org/10.3233/BMR-140191 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/BMR-140191

2. Efstathiou MA, Stefanakis M, Savva C, Giakas G. Effectiveness of neural mobilization in patients with spinal radiculopathy: a critical review. Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies. 2015; 19(2): 205-12.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbmt.2014.08.006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbmt.2014.08.006

3. Rhajib MAN, Islam MW, Hossain MZ, Rahman E. Evidence-based physiotherapy management of a cervical radiculopathy patient by using clinical reasoning process. Journal of Spine Research and Surgery. 2022; 4(2): 54-62.

https://doi.org/10.26502/fjsrs0041 DOI: https://doi.org/10.26502/fjsrs0041

4. Margetis K, Magnus W, Mesfin FB. Cervical Radiculopathy. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; Jan 2025. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK441828/

5. Mansfield M, Smith T, Spahr N, Thacker M. Cervical spine radiculopathy epidemiology: a systematic review. Musculoskeletal Care. 2020; 18(4): 555-67.

https://doi.org/10.1002/msc.1498 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/msc.1498

6. Dimitriadis Z, Kapreli E, Strimpakos N, Oldham J. Respiratory dysfunction in patients with chronic neck pain: What is the current evidence?. Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies. 2016; 20(4): 704-714.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbmt.2016.02.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbmt.2016.02.001

7. Taso M, Sommernes JH, Sundseth J, Pripp AH, Bjorland S, Engebretsen KB, et al. Surgical versus nonsurgical treatment for cervical radiculopathy. NEJM Evidence. 2025; 4(4): EVIDoa2400404.

https://doi.org/10.1056/EVIDoa2400404 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1056/EVIDoa2400404

8. Plener J, Csiernik B, To D, da Silva-Oolup S, Hofkirchner C, Cox J, et al. Conservative management of cervical radiculopathy: a systematic review. The Clinical Journal of Pain. 2023; 39(3): 138-46.

https://doi.org/10.1097/AJP.0000000000001092 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/AJP.0000000000001092

9. Rafiq S, Zafar H, Gillani SA, Waqas MS, Zia A, Liaqat S, et al. Comparison of neural mobilization and conservative treatment on pain, range of motion, and disability in cervical radiculopathy: A randomized controlled trial. Plos One. 2022; 17(12): e0278177.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0278177 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0278177

10. Rafiq S, Zafar H, Gillani S A, Razzaq A. Effectiveness Of Neuro Mobilisation On Pain, Range Of Motion, Muscle Endurance And Disability In Cervical Radiculopathy: A Systematic Review. JPMA. The Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association. 2023; 73(9): 1857-1861.

https://doi.org/10.47391/JPMA.7111 DOI: https://doi.org/10.47391/JPMA.7111

11. Anwar S, Arsalan A, Zafar H, Ahmad A, Hanif A. Effects of breathing reeducation on cervical and pulmonary outcomes in patients with non-specific chronic neck pain: A double blind randomized controlled trial. PloS One. 2022;17(8):e0273471.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0273471 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0273471

12. Cefalì A, Santini D, Lopez G, Maselli F, Rossettini G, Crestani M, et al. Effects of Breathing Exercises on Neck Pain Management: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2025; 14(3): 709.

https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14030709 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14030709

13. Jones SJ, Miller JMM. Spurling Test. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; Jan 2025. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK493152/

14. Olson LE, Millar AL, Dunker J, Hicks J, Glanz D. Reliability of a clinical test for deep cervical flexor endurance. Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics. 2006; 29(2): 134-8.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmpt.2005.12.009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmpt.2005.12.009

15. Hagert C-G, Hagert E. Manual muscle testing - a clinical examination technique for diagnosing focal neuropathies in the upper extremity. Upper Extremity Nerve Repair-Tips and Techniques: A Master Skills Publication. 2008; 451:465.